Question 1

(Scenario II) Which type of evaluation best describes the 2006 study described in Scenario II?

Accepted Answer

The 2006 study described in Scenario II is best categorized as an outcomes evaluation because it focuses on assessing the results or outcomes of a program or intervention, rather than its process, needs, or termination aspects.

Question 2

(Scenario III) Suppose each interviewee was asked to rate the extent to which illegal opioid drug use is a problem by using a 10-point scale where 0 = no problem and 10 = huge problem. Several years later, after a prevention program had been established, individuals were again asked to indicate how much of a problem opioid drug use is. Which type of test would be used to determine whether opioid drug perceptions changed?

Accepted Answer

A t-test is appropriate for comparing the means of two related groups to determine if there is a significant difference between them, which fits the scenario of comparing perceptions before and after the prevention program.

Question 3

(Scenario III) Suppose the city of Albuquerque implements a program to educate children about the dangers of prescription opioid drugs. In order to determine the effectiveness of this program they should conduct a(n)

Accepted Answer

An outcomes evaluation assesses the results of a program to determine its effectiveness, which in this case would measure how well the educational program changed children's attitudes or behaviors regarding prescription opioid drugs.

Question 4

A(n) _____ evaluation assesses the general program operation, including whom the program serves and how the program delivers services to that population.

Accepted Answer

A process evaluation assesses the implementation of a program, focusing on how it operates and serves its target population. This includes examining the procedures, activities, and delivery of services to understand the program's functioning.

Question 5

(Scenario II) When communicating the results about the effectiveness of the G.R.E.A.T. program, the authors should:

Accepted Answer

The answer of (Scenario II) When communicating the results about...

Question 6

_____ are monetary gifts given to help organizations meet a specific goal or objective.

Accepted Answer

Grants are monetary gifts often provided by governments, foundations, or corporations to organizations, individuals, or other entities to support a specific project, program, or objective. Unlike loans, grants do not need to be repaid.

Question 7

(Scenario I) The needs assessment associated with the study described in Scenario I probably included:

Accepted Answer

The needs assessment likely included all these elements: statistics on childhood obesity, literature on physical activity's benefits, and data on decreased physical activity among children.

Question 8

(Scenario II) The authors of the 2006 study described in Scenario II probably received a(n) _____ from the U.S. Department of Justice.

Accepted Answer

The authors likely received a grant from the U.S. Department of Justice to fund their research study, as grants are common forms of financial support for academic and scientific research.

Question 9

A(n) _____ evaluation identifies program features to continue or discontinue and determines potential new components to add.

Accepted Answer

A needs evaluation identifies gaps or needs in a program, helping to determine which features to continue, discontinue, or add.

Question 10

(Scenario I) Who may have been a stakeholder in the study described in Scenario I?

Accepted Answer

All of the above (elementary school children, parents, and teachers) could be stakeholders in a study involving an educational setting, as each group would have a vested interest in the outcomes of the study.

Question 11

(Scenario III) The study described in Scenario III is a(n):

Accepted Answer

The answer of (Scenario III) The study described in Scenario...

Question 12

_____ uses the scientific method to assess whether an organized activity is achieving its intended objectives.

Accepted Answer

Program evaluation uses the scientific method to assess the effectiveness of a program or organized activity in achieving its intended objectives. It involves systematically collecting and analyzing information to make informed decisions about program improvements, effectiveness, and policy development.

Question 13

Dr. Charles is specifically interested in evaluating his veterinary clinic in terms of its consistency with its stated objectives rather than the vet clinic's general program operation. He should be looking into which type of evaluation?

Accepted Answer

Outcomes evaluation focuses on assessing whether a program or initiative meets its stated objectives, which aligns with Dr. Charles's interest in evaluating the consistency of his veterinary clinic with its stated objectives.

Question 14

(Scenario I) What benefit did the word cloud described in Scenario I probably have?

Accepted Answer

The answer of (Scenario I) What benefit did the word...

Question 15

(Scenario II) Which of the following is a goal of the G.R.E.A.T. program?

Accepted Answer

The G.R.E.A.T. (Gang Resistance Education And Training) program aims to provide actionable information and strategies to organizations and communities to help prevent youth gang involvement and violence, offering immediate benefits to their programs.

Question 16

Paul wants to assess his pizza delivery service. He is specifically interested the general operation of his pizza delivery service and not its consistency with its stated objectives. Paul would be interested in conducting which type of evaluation?

Accepted Answer

Process evaluation focuses on the operation of a program or service, examining how it is delivered, which is what Paul is interested in for his pizza delivery service. It does not focus on outcomes or objectives but rather on the activities and processes involved.

Question 17

(Scenario I) Before the authors of Scenario I published their work they had to write a report to their stakeholders. According to your text, the authors should write their report:

Accepted Answer

The correct approach for writing a report to stakeholders is to use a format that is appropriate for the intended audience. This ensures that the information is accessible and understandable to those reading the report, regardless of their familiarity with scientific terminology or specific formatting styles like APA.

Question 18

(Scenario III) The authors of Scenario III most likely analyzed the interview responses using:

Accepted Answer

Content analysis is a method used to analyze text data from interviews, allowing researchers to quantify and analyze the presence, meanings, and relationships of certain words, themes, or concepts.

Question 19

A(n) _____ evaluation is an assessment to determine which features of a program are most valuable and whom they benefit most.

Accepted Answer

The answer of A(n) _____ evaluation is an assessment to...

Question 20

(Scenario II) During the planning phase of the G.R.E.A.T program, the researchers gathered content-rich information from a eight participants. This means of collecting data is called a/an:

Accepted Answer

Gathering content-rich information from a small group of participants is typically done through a focus group, which allows for in-depth discussion and feedback on specific topics.

Quiz 13: Using Research in the Real World: How Do You Know If You Are Truly Helping