If the negotiating parties are having difficulty coming up with OBJECTIVE CRITERIA to apply to their conflict, they could
A) Identify credible research that might help them identify useful criteria.
B) Speak with an expert in the field who could suggest criteria.
C) Consider criteria that have been applied in similar cases.
D) Use rules or guidelines that have been developed for agency policies or professional codes of conduct.
E) All of the above.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

If the negotiating parties are having difficulty coming up with objective criteria to apply to their conflict, they could:
a. Identify credible research that might help them identify useful criteria. By doing so, they can base their decisions on evidence and data that are relevant to the issue at hand.
b. Speak with an expert in the field who could suggest criteria. An expert's perspective can provide insights into industry standards, best practices, or innovative solutions that the parties might not have considered.
c. Consider criteria that have been applied in similar cases. Looking at precedents can help the parties understand how others have resolved similar conflicts and what criteria were deemed important in those situations.
d. Use rules or guidelines that have been developed for agency policies or professional codes of conduct. These established standards can serve as a neutral reference point for determining fair and appropriate criteria.
e. All of the above.
The best approach when parties are struggling to find objective criteria is to consider all of the above options. By combining research, expert advice, precedents, and established rules or guidelines, the parties can develop a well-rounded set of objective criteria that is fair, balanced, and grounded in rationality. This multi-faceted approach can help ensure that the criteria are not only objective but also relevant and acceptable to all parties involved in the negotiation.

If the Negotiating Parties Are Having Difficulty Coming Up with OBJECTIVE