An arbitrator's erroneous view of the law,no matter how egregious,is always binding because the disputing parties have agreed to accept their arbitrator's view of the law.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The fact that an arbitrator made erroneous rulings during a hearing, or reached erroneous findings of fact from evidence, is no ground for setting aside an award because the parties have agreed that the arbitrator should be the judge of the facts. An erroneous view of the law, no matter how egregious, is binding because the parties have agreed to accept the arbitrator's view of the law.

An Arbitrator's Erroneous View of the Law,no Matter How Egregious,is