An experienced female crane operator just hired by a new firm was told it was company policy that crane operators urinate over the side of their cranes rather than stop work. The same policy applied to male crane operators. She objected to the policy, was offered alternative jobs, but none as a crane operator, and she quit. Does she have a valid claim for sex discrimination?
A) No, because practice is neutral, and therefore non-discriminatory.
B) No, because she was offered alternative positions.
C) Yes, because the practice was a form of disparate impact.
D) Yes, because the firm did not create a different rule for bathroom breaks for her.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q16: A firm had been sued and found
Q17: Of the elements necessary to prove a
Q18: In disparate treatment cases:
A)the focus is on
Q19: Which of the following is a protected
Q20: Which of the following is a neutral
Q21: Certain protected classes are recognized under various
Q22: Why is each of the following good
Q23: Of the following, the most effective way
Q25: In disparate impact cases:
A)the focus is on
Q26: Sam and Sarah, husband and wife, both
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents