In the Facts of the Previous Questions,according to the Reasoning

In the facts of the previous questions,according to the reasoning of the dissent in the Greene case,VividAire may owe consumers of air freshener

A) a duty not to increase the price of the product if it does not perform as promised.
B) a duty to warn that ingesting the liquid poses a specific material risk of death.
C) a refund or replacement if the product does not freshen the air.
D) no duty with respect to the liquid's air-freshening capability or to harm that may result from ingesting it.