Services
Discover
Homeschooling
Ask a Question
Log in
Sign up
Filters
Done
Question type:
Essay
Multiple Choice
Short Answer
True False
Matching
Topic
Business
Study Set
Modern Labor Economics
Quiz 6: Supply of Labor to the Economy: The Decision to Work
Path 4
Access For Free
Share
All types
Filters
Study Flashcards
Practice Exam
Learn
Question 21
Essay
Frankie and Johnny can both earn a wage rate of $10 per hour and,coincidentally,both have $100 per week in non-labor income.Assume that both have T = 100 hours per week to allocate to leisure and work.Frankie chooses to work 40 hours per week.Johnny,on the other hand,chooses not to work at all! Use indifference curve analysis to account for why two individuals confronting the same wage rate and with the same amount of non-labor income make such different labor supply choices.
Question 22
Multiple Choice
A worker is indifferent between job one lasting 4 hours a day,job two lasting 8 hours a day,and job three lasting 12 hours a day.Job two pays $10 an hour and tangency between the indifference curve and the budget constraint occurs at 8 hours.One can conclude that
Question 23
Multiple Choice
An individual's reservation wage
Question 24
Essay
Why are indifference curves between money income and leisure convex to the origin of the graph? In your discussion,introduce the concept of marginal rate of substitution between leisure and money income and explain its relevance to the convexity property of the indifference curves.
Question 25
Essay
"The wage rate (w)is the 'price' that the labor market attaches to an hour of the individual's time." How is this any different from the individual's marginal rate of substitution between leisure and income? Explain carefully.
Question 26
Multiple Choice
Consider the above figure.If the wage rate is initially $8 per hour and subsequently increases to $12 per hour,then
Question 27
Multiple Choice
-The figure above illustrates a "spiked" budget constraint attendant to income replacement programs such as workers' compensation and unemployment insurance.Assume that,prior to injury or unemployment,the worker earns $E? per time period,works H
0
= A - L
0
hours,and enjoys utility level U
1
.In order to minimize the work disincentives associated with income replacement while maintaining the worker near the original level of utility,the program ought to pay a benefit
Question 28
Essay
Jack currently works 38 hours per week at a wage rate of $15 per hour.His marginal rate of substitution is $20 per hour.Is Jack's utility maximized? If yes,explain why.If no,explain why not and discuss what Jack should do in order to further increase utility.
Question 29
Multiple Choice
An increase in the wage rate when the substitution effect dominates will ________ labor force participation and ________ hours of work.
Question 30
Multiple Choice
A welfare program offers $4000 of benefits to those not working.For those working,it reduces benefits dollar for dollar until there are no benefits to be paid.The program is then modified so that for every dollar earned,benefits are only reduced by 50 cents.Mr.X earned $6000 under the old program.What will be the effect of the new program (noting that he is in the range to receive benefits) ?
Question 31
Multiple Choice
A country has no welfare program.Then it introduces the following program: everyone gets $4000 if they work more than 1000 hours a year (on top of what they earn) .The effect of this event will be to ________ the labor force participation and the effect of this event on those who were working more than 1000 hours will be to ________ hours of work.
Question 32
Multiple Choice
Mary earns $20 an hour and works 10 hours a week.She gets a raise to $30 an hour but at the same time her fixed weekly work expenses go up $100.If she continues to work,she will most likely
Question 33
Essay
How does an increase in non-labor income affect desired hours of work for a labor force participant? Use indifference curve analysis to illustrate and support your answer.State any assumptions that you make.
Question 34
Multiple Choice
In 1986 Congress drastically cut the marginal tax rate on upper income levels from 50% to 28%.Empirical evidence analyzing the labor supply effects of the tax cut found that women in the high income tax bracket