Trace claims that one of the contract terms is the $20 price per tuner.Is he correct?
A)Yes,but only if there is another writing with the $20 price per tuner.
B)Yes,because the written agreement was conditioned on the $20 per tuner oral agreement.
C)No,because the parol evidence rule prevents parties from introducing oral evidence when there is a written contract.
D)No,because he failed to include price in the writing.
E)No,because no exception applies to the parol evidence rule.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)The parol evidence rule does not prevent parties from introducing evidence
proving the written agreement was conditioned on terms agreed to orally.
B)The parol evidence rule does not prevent parties from introducing evidence proving the written agreement was conditioned on terms agreed to orally.
C)The parol evidence rule does not prevent parties from introducing evidence proving the written agreement was conditioned on terms agreed to orally.
D)The parol evidence rule does not prevent parties from introducing evidence proving the written agreement was conditioned on terms agreed to orally.
E)The parol evidence rule does not prevent parties from introducing evidence proving the written agreement was conditioned on terms agreed to orally.

Trace Claims That One of the Contract Terms Is the $20