Regarding Damian's assertion that under the parol evidence rule he had the right to identify the house referenced in the contract,which of the following is true?
A)Damian is incorrect because the parol evidence rule would not apply in situations involving an ambiguity.
B)Damian is incorrect because under the parol evidence rule,Frida,as the buyer,would be allowed to identify the subject matter in the event of a discrepancy.
C)Damian is incorrect because under the parol evidence rule,the judge would likely allow oral evidence regarding the house at issue in order to clarify an ambiguity.
D)Damian is correct.
E)Damian is incorrect because the parol evidence rule would not apply in the absence of a merger clause.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)To reach the most accurate interpretation of the original agreement,the court allows evidence,even if it is oral,for the sole purpose of clarifying,not changing,ambiguous contractual terms.
B)To reach the most accurate interpretation of the original agreement,the court allows evidence,even if it is oral,for the sole purpose of clarifying,not changing,ambiguous contractual terms.
C)To reach the most accurate interpretation of the original agreement,the court allows evidence,even if it is oral,for the sole purpose of clarifying,not changing,ambiguous contractual terms.
D)To reach the most accurate interpretation of the original agreement,the court allows evidence,even if it is oral,for the sole purpose of clarifying,not changing,ambiguous contractual terms.
E)To reach the most accurate interpretation of the original agreement,the court allows evidence,even if it is oral,for the sole purpose of clarifying,not changing,ambiguous contractual terms.

Regarding Damian's Assertion That Under the Parol Evidence Rule He