Did Alan act properly in hearing the dispute?
A)He should have revealed that he had received loans from Jae,but he had no obligation to reveal other information.
B)He should have revealed all the information and should have refused to arbitrate the case.His actions would be considered by a federal district judge and the award would likely be set aside because of a showing of bias.
C)He should have revealed that he was married to Jae's cousin,but none of the other information had to be revealed.
D)He acted properly because he only had to reveal the information at issue if Lydia had directly asked about it.
E)He acted properly because it is presumed that arbitrators are unbiased regardless of their relationship with a party.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)An arbitration award may be set aside under the Federal Arbitration Act if the arbitrator displays bias or corruption.
B)An arbitration award may be set aside under the Federal Arbitration Act if the arbitrator displays bias or corruption.
C)An arbitration award may be set aside under the Federal Arbitration Act if the arbitrator displays bias or corruption.
D)An arbitration award may be set aside under the Federal Arbitration Act if the arbitrator displays bias or corruption.
E)An arbitration award may be set aside under the Federal Arbitration Act if the arbitrator displays bias or corruption.

Did Alan Act Properly in Hearing the Dispute