Was Dominic correct when he told Naomi that if she lost at the arbitration level,a federal judge would consider the case anew without consideration of the arbitration agreement?
A)Dominic is correct only because an international company is involved.
B)Yes,because an action in court is considered completely separate from an arbitration proceeding.
C)No,because the arbitration agreement would completely bar Naomi's ability to file a court action.
D)No,because in a later court action,a federal judge in district court would only reverse an arbitrator's decision for certain reasons such as that the arbitrator displayed bias or corruption.
E)Yes,but only if Naomi filed an "Intent to Seek Further Relief" form with the arbitrator.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)The U.S.Supreme Court has upheld provisions of the Federal Arbitration Act
limiting the circumstances under which a federal court should set aside an arbitration award.
B)The U.S.Supreme Court has upheld provisions of the Federal Arbitration Act limiting the circumstances under which a federal court should set aside an arbitration award.
C)The U.S.Supreme Court has upheld provisions of the Federal Arbitration Act limiting the circumstances under which a federal court should set aside an arbitration award.
D)The U.S.Supreme Court has upheld provisions of the Federal Arbitration Act limiting the circumstances under which a federal court should set aside an arbitration award.
E)The U.S.Supreme Court has upheld provisions of the Federal Arbitration Act limiting the circumstances under which a federal court should set aside an arbitration award.

Was Dominic Correct When He Told Naomi That If She