Services
Discover
Homeschooling
Ask a Question
Log in
Sign up
Filters
Done
Question type:
Essay
Multiple Choice
Short Answer
True False
Matching
Topic
Business
Study Set
Managerial Accounting Study Set 2
Quiz 12: Relevant Costs for Decision Making
Path 4
Access For Free
Share
All types
Filters
Study Flashcards
Practice Exam
Learn
Question 101
True/False
Two or more different products that are manufactured in the same production period are known as joint products.
Question 102
Essay
The Hyatt Company is trying to decide whether it should purchase new equipment and continue to make its subassemblies internally or if production should be discontinued and the subassembly purchased from an outside supplier. New equipment for producing the subassemblies can be purchased at a cost of $400,000.The equipment would have a five-year useful life (the company uses straight-line depreciation)and a $50,000 salvage value. Alternatively,the subassemblies could be purchased from an outside supplier.The supplier has offered to provide the subassemblies for $9 each under a five-year contract. Hyatt Company's present costs per unit of producing the subassemblies internally (with the old equipment)are given below.The costs are based on a current activity level of 40,000 subassemblies per year:
Direct Materials
Direct Labour
Variable Overhead
Fixed Overhead ( $ 0.80 supervision, $ 0.90 depreciation,
and $ 2 general company overhead)
Total Cost per Unit
$
3.00
$
4.20
$
0.60
$
3.70
$
11.50
\begin{array}{l}\begin{array}{lll}\text { Direct Materials}\\\text { Direct Labour}\\\text { Variable Overhead}\\\text { Fixed Overhead ( \$ 0.80 supervision, \$ 0.90 depreciation, }\\\text { and \$ 2 general company overhead)}\\\text { Total Cost per Unit}\\\end{array}\begin{array}{lll}\$ 3.00 \\\$ 4.20 \\\$ 0.60 \\\\\$ 3.70 \\\$ 11.50\end{array}\end{array}
Direct Materials
Direct Labour
Variable Overhead
Fixed Overhead ( $ 0.80 supervision, $ 0.90 depreciation,
and $ 2 general company overhead)
Total Cost per Unit
$3.00
$4.20
$0.60
$3.70
$11.50
The new equipment would be more efficient and would reduce direct labour costs and variable overhead costs by 25%. Supervision cost ($30,000 per year) and direct materials cost per unit would not be affected by the new equipment. The company has no other use for the space now being used to produce the subassemblies. The company's total general company overhead would not be affected by this decision. Assume direct labour is a variable cost. Required: Assume that 40,000 subassemblies are needed each year. Prepare an analysis of the two alternatives and make a recommendation to the management of the company of the appropriate course of action.
Question 103
True/False
(Appendix 12A)The markup over cost under the absorption costing approach would increase if the unit product cost increases,holding everything else constant.
Question 104
True/False
Using the profitability index,it is easy to decide which product is less profitable and should be de-emphasized.
Question 105
True/False
Only the variable costs identified with a product are relevant in a decision concerning whether to eliminate the product or not.
Question 106
Essay
Foster Company makes 20,000 units per year of a part that it uses in the products it manufactures.The unit product cost of this part is computed as follows:
Direct Materials
$
24.70
Direct Labour
$
16.30
Variable Manufacturing Overhead
$
2.30
Fixed Manufacturing Overhead
$
13.40
Unit Product Cost
$
56.70
\begin{array}{lccc}\text { Direct Materials } & \$ 24.70 \\\text { Direct Labour } & \$ 16.30 \\\text { Variable Manufacturing Overhead } & \$ 2.30 \\\text { Fixed Manufacturing Overhead } & \$ 13.40 \\\text { Unit Product Cost } & \$ 56.70\end{array}
Direct Materials
Direct Labour
Variable Manufacturing Overhead
Fixed Manufacturing Overhead
Unit Product Cost
$24.70
$16.30
$2.30
$13.40
$56.70
An outside supplier has offered to sell the company all the parts that Foster needs for $51.80 a unit. If the company accepts this offer, the facilities now being used to make the part could be used to make more units of a product that is in high demand. The additional contribution margin on this other product would be $44,000 per year. If the part were purchased from the outside supplier, all of the direct labour cost of the part would be avoided. However, $5.10 of the fixed manufacturing overhead cost that is being applied to the part would continue, even if the part were purchased from the outside supplier. This fixed manufacturing overhead cost would be applied to the company's remaining products. Required: a) How much of the unit product cost of $56.70 is relevant in the decision of whether to make or buy the part? b) What is the net total dollar advantage (disadvantage) of purchasing the part rather than making it? c) What is the maximum amount the company should be willing to pay an outside supplier per unit for the part if the supplier commits to supplying all 20,000 units required each year?
Question 107
Essay
Madison Optometry is considering the purchase of a new lens grinder to replace a machine that was purchased several years ago.Selected information on the two machines is given below:
Original cost when new
Accumulated depreciation to date
Current salvage value
Annual operating cost
Remaining useful life
OId
New
Machine
Machine
$
80
,
000
$
85
,
000
32
,
000
−
−
−
26
,
000
−
−
−
4
,
000
3
,
000
4
years
4
years
\begin{array}{l}\begin{array}{lll}\\ \\\text {Original cost when new}\\\text {Accumulated depreciation to date}\\\text {Current salvage value}\\\text {Annual operating cost}\\\text {Remaining useful life}\\\end{array}\begin{array}{lll}\text { OId} &\text { New} \\\text { Machine } &\text { Machine } \\ \$ 80,000 & \$ 85,000 \\32,000 & ---\\26,000 &--- \\4,000 & 3,000 \\4 \text { years } & 4 \text { years}\end{array}\end{array}
Original cost when new
Accumulated depreciation to date
Current salvage value
Annual operating cost
Remaining useful life
OId
Machine
$80
,
000
32
,
000
26
,
000
4
,
000
4
years
New
Machine
$85
,
000
−
−
−
−
−
−
3
,
000
4
years
Ignore income taxes and the time value of money in this problem. Required: Compute the total advantage or disadvantage of using the new machine instead of the old machine over the next four years.
Question 108
True/False
The cost of resources that has no alternative use in a make or buy decision has an opportunity cost of zero.
Question 109
True/False
If by dropping a product a firm can avoid more in fixed costs than it loses in contribution margin,then the firm is better off economically if the product is dropped.
Question 110
True/False
(Appendix 12A)The markup over cost under the absorption costing approach would increase if the required rate of return increases,holding everything else constant.
Question 111
Essay
Benjamin Signal Company produces products R,J,and C from a joint production process.Each product may be sold at the split-off point or be processed further.Joint production costs of $92,000 per year are allocated to the products based on the relative number of units produced.Data for Benjamin's operations for the current year are as follows:
Product
Units
Produced
Allocated Joint
Production Cost
Sales Value
at Split-off
R
8
,
000
$
32
,
000
$
76
,
000
J
10
,
000
40
,
000
71
,
000
C
5
,
000
20
,
000
48
,
000
\begin{array}{lccc}\text { Product } & \begin{array} { l } \text { Units } \\\text { Produced }\end{array} & \begin{array} { l } \text { Allocated Joint } \\\text { Production Cost }\end{array} & \begin{array} { c } \text { Sales Value } \\\text { at Split-off }\end{array} \\\hline \mathrm { R } & 8,000 & \$ 32,000 & \$ 76,000 \\\mathrm {~J} & 10,000 & 40,000 & 71,000 \\\mathrm { C } & 5,000 & 20,000 & 48,000\end{array}
Product
R
J
C
Units
Produced
8
,
000
10
,
000
5
,
000
Allocated Joint
Production Cost
$32
,
000
40
,
000
20
,
000
Sales Value
at Split-off
$76
,
000
71
,
000
48
,
000
Product R can be processed beyond the split-off point for an additional cost of $26,000 and can then be sold for $105,000. Product J can be processed beyond the split-off point for an additional cost of $38,000 and can then be sold for $117,000. Product C can be processed beyond the split-off point for an additional cost of $12,000 and can then be sold for $57,000. Required: Which products should be processed beyond the split-off point?
Question 112
True/False
(Appendix 12A)In target costing,the anticipated competitive market price of a product determines its maximum allowable product cost.
Question 113
True/False
(Appendix 12A)The absorption costing approach to cost-plus pricing will result in attaining the company's required rate of return only if forecasted unit sales are realized,holding all other things constant.
Question 114
True/False
(Appendix 12A)If a company sells a product for less than its budgeted unit product cost under absorption costing,then the company will lose money.
Question 115
True/False
Joint production costs are relevant costs in decisions about what to do with a product from the split-off point onward in the production process.
Question 116
True/False
(Appendix 12A)The time and material approach pricing will result in attaining the company's desired profit only if forecasted billable activity is realized,holding all other things constant.
Question 117
True/False
Managers should pay little attention to bottleneck operations because they have limited capacity for producing output.
Question 118
True/False
Opportunity costs are recorded in the accounts of an organization.
Question 119
True/False
All other things equal,it is profitable to continue processing a joint product after the split-off point so long as the incremental revenue from further processing exceeds the incremental costs of further processing.