Did George act properly in hearing the dispute?
A) He acted properly because it is presumed that arbitrators are unbiased regardless of their relationship with a party.
B) He acted properly because he only had to reveal the information at issue if Susan had directly asked about it.
C) He should have revealed that he was married to Bob's cousin, but none of the other information had to be revealed.
D) He should have revealed that he had received loans from Bob, but he had no obligation to reveal other information.
E) He should have revealed all the information and should have refused to arbitrate the case. His actions would be considered by a federal district judge and the award would likely be set aside because of showing of bias.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

An arbitration award may be set aside under the Federal Arbitration Act if the arbitrator displays bias or corruption.

Did George Act Properly in Hearing the Dispute