Which of the following is not a correctly paraphrased test for just cause as noted in the text?
A)Was any investigation conducted fairly and objectively?
B)Has the company applied its rules evenhandedly,and without discrimination?
C)Was the rule or order reasonably related to the orderly and safe operation of the business?
D)Did the company give a written warning as a disciplinary action to individuals who broke the rules?
E)Did the company make an effort to insure that the employee did in fact violate a rule or order?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The original test for just cause listed in the text is "Did the employee violate a rule or order that was known, reasonable, and consistently enforced?" None of the other options match the original test except for D, which is an incorrect paraphrase. The original test includes the requirements that the rule or order be known, reasonable, and consistently enforced, while D only mentions a written warning as a disciplinary action.

Which of the Following Is Not a Correctly Paraphrased Test