Use the following
A study recently described in Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics investigated the impacts of mult-tasking on people who play video games and those who don't. Participants in the study were asked to perform three visually demanding tasks with (dual-task) and without (single-task) answering unrelated questions over the phone. One of the tasks involved tracking multiple circles moving around on a computer monitor. At the 5% significance level, the authors of the study concluded "tracking accuracy was significantly worse in the dual-task condition"
for both people who play video games and those who do not.
-What conclusion would the authors have made at the 1% significance level?
A) Tracking accuracy was significantly worse in the dual-task condition.
B) Tracking accuracy was not significantly worse in the dual-task condition.
C) Not enough information

Question

Use the following 
A study recently described in Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics investigated the impacts of mult-tasking on people who play video games and those who don't. Participants in the study were asked to perform three visually demanding tasks with (dual-task) and without (single-task) answering unrelated questions over the phone. One of the tasks involved tracking multiple circles moving around on a computer monitor. At the 5% significance level, the authors of the study concluded "tracking accuracy was significantly worse in the dual-task condition"
for both people who play video games and those who do not.
-What conclusion would the authors have made at the 1% significance level?
A) Tracking accuracy was significantly worse in the dual-task condition.
B) Tracking accuracy was not significantly worse in the dual-task condition.
C) Not enough information

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The conclusion at the 1% significance level cannot be determined from the information provided, as the study's results were only specified for the 5% significance level.

Use the Following