Critics often respond to the DROWNING CHILD argument from Chapter 7 by pointing out differences between the case of the child drowning in a pond and the case of children dying from poverty in distant countries. How does Peter Singer respond when people point out those differences?
A) He "bites the bullet" and admits that the conclusion holds despite those morally relevant differences.
B) He insists that his moral intuition is that those differences are not morally relevant.
C) He changes the scenario in the analogy to eliminate those differences (e.g., by adding other people near the pond who could help) .
D) He points out that such differences do not undermine the point about having obligations to save people in your own community.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q8: What is a legal precedent?
A) A legal
Q9: Which of the following best explains what
Q10: Which of the following concepts is critical
Q11: Which of the following best captures the
Q12: What is an "evolving analogy," as explained
Q14: According to Chapter 7, what is the
Q15: According to Chapter 7, comparing an action
Q16: A refutation by logical analogy is:
A) An
Q17: Which of the following best explains the
Q18: What is a refutation by logical analogy
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents