Judith Jarvis Thomson's violinist case is a clear example of a person with a right to life and a person who could use his body to save that person. But maybe this case is different from abortion in a morally relevant way. In your essay, consider the following question: what would have to be true for Thomson to be right about the violinist case and wrong about the abortion case? In other words, develop an objection to Thomson that says that there is a morally relevant difference between the violinist case and the abortion case.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is -Outline a moral feature that, if true, would make the violinist case morally different from abortion.
-Defend an objection to Thomspon that uses this moral feature to say that she's right about the violinist but wrong about abortion-if only insofar as she compares it to the violinist case.

Judith Jarvis Thomson's Violinist Case Is a Clear Example of a Person