Katie is much better than Enrico at interpreting the nonverbal cues of their boss. What explanation might you offer for this difference, applying a historical perspective?
A) Because women have historically had less power, they have had greater incentive to read men's nonverbal cues than the other way around.
B) Higher levels of testosterone make men less sensitive to nonverbal cues.
C) Higher levels of estrogen make women more sensitive to nonverbal cues.
D) Historically, men who ignore nonverbal cues rise more quickly to positions of power in organizations.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Historically, women have often been in positions where they had less power, which necessitated a greater sensitivity to nonverbal cues as a means of navigating social and professional environments. This skill allowed them to better understand and respond to the intentions and feelings of those in power, who were predominantly men.

Katie Is Much Better Than Enrico at Interpreting the Nonverbal