Which of the following is true about contracts that have been subsequently modified?
A) Parol evidence contradictory to the final terms is admissible.
B) Parol evidence regarding a contract's subsequent modification is inadmissible.
C) If the agreement is required to be in writing because it is within the statute of frauds, oral modifications are unenforceable.
D) Oral evidence of a subsequent written agreement is inadmissible.
E) If the contract's terms require that modification be in writing, oral modifications are admissible.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

C) If the agreement is required to be in writing because it is within the statute of frauds, oral modifications are generally unenforceable. This is because the statute of frauds requires certain types of contracts to be in writing to be legally enforceable.

Which of the Following Is True About Contracts That Have