Which of the following situations would not be permitted to defer the recognition of any recapture that might arise from the disposition of an asset?
A) A building that was used for income earning purposes was destroyed in a flood.Insurance proceeds were received which generated recapture.A new building was built 18 months later.
B) A piece of equipment that belonged to a company was stolen in November 2019.Insurance proceeds were received which generated recapture.The equipment was replaced in December of 2020.
C) A piece of equipment that belonged to a construction company was sold in June 2019.The proceeds from the sale generated recapture.A new piece of equipment was purchased in January of 2020.The company's fiscal year-end is December 31st.
D) A building that was used for income earning purposes was sold in December 2019.The proceeds from the sale generated recapture.A new building was purchased in April 2020.The company's fiscal year-end is December 31st.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: TEX Co.was incorporated in 2020.Incorporation costs were
Q2: SAMI Ltd.was incorporated on January 1, 2020.The
Q3: BIG Co.purchased a piece of Class 8
Q4: Which of the following statements regarding recapture
Q5: EARTH Inc.began operating ten years ago and
Q6: Which of the following cases is not
Q7: Lou Silva has owned and operated
Q8: In 2019 a storage facility was destroyed
Q9: WKL Ltd.is a Canadian-controlled private corporation
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents