Solved

Match the Following Cases with Their Main Features

Question 61

Matching

Match the following cases with their main features.

Premises:
Osborne v. Ohio
Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition
New Yorkv. Ferber
U.S. v. Williams
Central Hudson Gas and Electric v.Public Service Commission of New York
Responses:
making virtual pornography legal
ruling that PROTECT does not prohibit a substantial amount of protected speech
placing of child pornography outside the umbrella of free speech guaranteed by the Constitution
establishing a standard of scienter that had been lacking in the previous ruling
evaluating the application of the First Amendment to commercial speech

Correct Answer:

Osborne v. Ohio
Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition
New Yorkv. Ferber
U.S. v. Williams
Central Hudson Gas and Electric v.Public Service Commission of New York
Related Questions

Q52: In order to tighten prohibitions of child

Q53: The _ Act was designed to overcome

Q54: In United States v.Mento, the petitioner argued

Q55: In FCC v.Pacifica Foundation, the court ruled

Q56: Prior to the 1950s, traditional notions of

Q57: The _ Act of 2006 sought to

Q58: The resolute silence of the _ with

Q59: Discuss the existing legislations regarding Internet gambling

Q60: Legislation regarding Child pornography and child victimization

Q62: Match the following Acts with their major

Unlock this Answer For Free Now!

View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions

qr-code

Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks

upload documents

Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents