In United States v.Mento, the petitioner argued that the CPPA was unconstitutional as it unfairly abridged the ________ Amendment, as it is aimed at inhibiting the expression of child pornography itself as opposed to the secondary effect of such expression.

Question

In United States v.Mento, the petitioner argued that the CPPA was unconstitutional as it unfairly abridged the ________ Amendment, as it is aimed at inhibiting the expression of child pornography itself as opposed to the secondary effect of such expression.

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of In United States v.Mento, the petitioner argued that the CPPA was unconstitutional as it unfairly abridged the ________ Amendment, as it is aimed at inhibiting the expression of child pornography itself as opposed to the secondary effect of such expression.

In United States V