The showoff hypothesis and hunting hypothesis are competing explanations in that __________.
A)one argues that men provided for their families and the other that men provided food to non-family members to gain social benefits through increased status
B)one argues that men should spend less time hunting and the other,more
C)one argues that the majority of caloric intake is through meat and the other through vegetables
D)one argues that women should be impressed by a male's hunting prowess and the other that women should not be impressed by a male's hunting prowess

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The showoff hypothesis and hunting hypothesis are both explanations for why men may have hunted, but they offer different perspectives on the motivation for hunting. The showoff hypothesis suggests that men may have hunted to gain social status and impress potential mates, while the hunting hypothesis suggests that men may have hunted primarily to provide for their families. These are competing explanations because they offer different perspectives on why men may have engaged in hunting behavior.

The Showoff Hypothesis and Hunting Hypothesis Are Competing Explanations in That