Mr. Holden, a program developer, had a successful business helping small firms and shops computerize their businesses. In his spare time, he developed software for inventory control that was superior to others on the market. He launched an ad campaign and all went well for several months until a competitor came out with a cheaper program. In time, he could not pay his debts when they became due and owing. A supplier sued for damages and was awarded $21,000. Holden did not pay. With regard to the supplier's position at this time, which of the following is false?
A) The supplier could get a government official to seize and sell enough of Holden's property to satisfy the debt.
B) The supplier could examine Holden under oath about his assets and sources of income.
C) The supplier could have a garnishee order served on Holden's bank, ordering the bank to pay money into court instead of to Holden.
D) Since the decision is in his favour, the supplier would be a judgment creditor, Holden, a judgment debtor.
E) The supplier could obtain a writ of execution that directs a court official to seize Holden and detain him in court until he arranges payment.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q26: Which of the following is correct with
Q27: Which of the following statements concerning limitation
Q28: Several provinces have implemented 'mental health courts'.
Q29: In Semelhago v. Paramadevan, the Supreme Court
Q30: (Modify this question for your province.) Which
Q32: Which of the following accurately reflects a
Q33: Which of the following is true with
Q34: In the procedure leading to trial of
Q35: Hank sold three properties for Mr. W
Q36: In the Ontario Court of Appeal decision
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents