When he begins deliberating with fellow jurors,DeAndre is convinced of the defendant's guilt.As he listens attentively,he rethinks his own position in order to evaluate the evidence for the perspective of innocence.This point-counterpoint method of deliberation is an example of
A)contextual intelligence.
B)dialectical reasoning.
C)formal reasoning.
D)inductive reasoning.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The point-counterpoint method of deliberation is an example of dialectical reasoning, which involves evaluating opposing viewpoints in order to arrive at a conclusion. This process allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the evidence and can lead to a more informed decision. Contextual intelligence involves understanding and navigating social situations, formal reasoning is a logical method of problem-solving, and inductive reasoning involves drawing conclusions based on observations. None of these accurately describe DeAndre's deliberation process.

When He Begins Deliberating with Fellow Jurors,DeAndre Is Convinced of the Defendant's