Why did the Renaissance philosopher Francis Bacon question the validity of deductive reasoning? Which type of reasoning did he suggest as an alternative?
A) Bacon believed that deductive reasoning was prone to biases. He suggested hypothetico-deductive reasoning as an alternative.
B) Bacon believed that deductive reasoning was prone to biases. He suggested inductive reasoning as an alternative.
C) Bacon believed that deductive reasoning often failed to result in general theories. He suggested hypothetico-deductive reasoning as an alternative.
D) Bacon believed that deductive reasoning often failed to result in general theories. He suggested inductive reasoning as an alternative.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Bacon believed that deductive reasoning was prone to biases because it relied on general principles and assumptions that may not always hold true. He suggested inductive reasoning as an alternative because it involves collecting and analyzing specific observations and data to form general theories or explanations. This method is less prone to biases because it relies on empirical evidence rather than assumptions.

Why Did the Renaissance Philosopher Francis Bacon Question the Validity