Alan entered into a written contract for the purchase of a house owned by Joe.But as the time to move approached,Alan discovered that Joe was refusing to move out and refusing to transfer the property.Apparently a dissatisfied customer had driven through the showroom window of Joe's new car dealership causing him considerable expense.Joe could no longer afford to purchase the new luxury home in Langley to which he had intended to move.Which of the following is the appropriate remedy in these circumstances for Alan,who really wants the house?
A)specific performance
B)damages
C)injunction
D)rescission
E)no remedy

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Specific performance is the appropriate remedy in this situation as it would compel Joe to transfer the property to Alan, as had been agreed to in the written contract. Damages may not be sufficient as Alan may really want the house, and an injunction would not necessarily solve the issue of Joe refusing to transfer the property. Rescission may not be appropriate either as it would simply cancel the contract and neither party would have any obligations or rights. Therefore, specific performance is the best option for Alan to ensure he gets the house he contracted for.

Alan Entered into a Written Contract for the Purchase of a House