Which of the following was the result in the case in the text,Novamedix Limited v.NDM Acquisition Corporation and Vesta Healthcare Inc.,in which the plaintiff claimed that a settlement agreement was a contract for the sale of goods breached by the defendant because a type of medical slipper involved in the settlement agreement could not be resold?
A) That the transaction would not be treated as a contract for the sale of goods because the predominant purpose of the settlement agreement was to settle a patent infringement lawsuit.
B) That the transaction would not be treated as a contract for the sale of goods because it was a mixed type of transaction.
C) That the transaction would not be treated as a contract for the sale of goods because of the involvement of medical treatment issues.
D) That the transaction would be treated as a contract for the sale of goods because the essential nature of the agreement was the exchange of slippers for the release of a legal right.
E) That the transaction would be treated as a contract for the sale of goods because it was a mixed type of transaction.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q21: Under Article 2 of the UCC, which
Q24: Under the UCC,when is an acceptance effective?
A)
Q25: Which of the following is a special
Q26: Under Article 2 of the UCC which
Q27: Under Article 2(A)of the UCC,a[n] _ is
Q28: A contract that combines a good with
Q29: Which of the following is true regarding
Q31: To resolve contract issues in cases in
Q33: If a firm offer is silent as
Q34: Under Article 2(A)of the UCC,a[n] _ is
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents