Courts may justify the enforcement of some contracts, even though there is no consideration, by stating that there was:
A) monetary consideration.
B) moral consideration.
C) pecuniary consideration.
D) fiscal consideration.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Courts may justify the enforcement of some contracts, even though there is no consideration, by stating that there was moral consideration. This means that one party has done something out of a sense of moral or ethical duty, rather than for financial gain. For example, if someone promises to donate money to a charity and the charity relies on this promise in some way, the promise may be enforceable even though there was no monetary consideration involved.

Courts May Justify the Enforcement of Some Contracts, Even Though