With respect to Arthur Anderson,a large and well-known public accounting and consulting firm,the Legal Briefcase box,"Paying the Price" explains:
A)how Arthur Anderson's connection with the Enron scandal was not enough to bring it down.
B)how as soon as Arthur Anderson cleared itself by paying fines to the federal government,it went back to "business as usual".
C)that Arthur Anderson's prior conviction was overturned,but it never recovered.
D)that Arthur Anderson's consulting arm always behaved ethically,so it was saveD.Even though Arthur Anderson's prior conviction associated with the grievous behavior of their former client,Enron was overturned in the courts,the firm was never able to recover.It is no longer in business.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

This is the only option that accurately describes the outcome for Arthur Anderson after its prior conviction. While the other options touch on certain aspects of the situation, they are not entirely accurate or complete in their explanations.

With Respect to Arthur Anderson,a Large and Well-Known Public Accounting