What was a key difference between Fiske's testimony for Hopkins and Baldus' Testimony in McCleskey?
A)Fiske used widely accepted statistical techniques in her research.
B)Fiske used social framework testimony.
C)The Supreme Court cited Fiske's testimony as important to their decision.
D)Fiske's testimony was more widely endorsed by psychologists.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Fiske's testimony for Hopkins utilized social framework testimony, which applies social science research to the facts of a case, helping to contextualize evidence or behavior within broader societal patterns. This approach was a key difference from Baldus' testimony in McCleskey, which focused on statistical evidence of racial disparities in the application of the death penalty.

What Was a Key Difference Between Fiske's Testimony for Hopkins