Why did the court rule to exclude the testimony of profiler John Douglas in State of Ohio v.Lowe?
A)Douglas did not have the proper experience to do a criminal profile.
B)The State did not follow correct procedure in introducing the testimony.
C)The testimony was deemed irrelevant to the case.
D)It did not have the scientific reliability to be considered evidence.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court ruled to exclude the testimony of profiler John Douglas in State of Ohio v. Lowe because it did not have the scientific reliability to be considered evidence. The technique of criminal profiling is a controversial one and has not been proven to be scientifically reliable. Therefore, the court determined that Douglas's testimony lacked the necessary foundation and rigor to be admissible as evidence.

Why Did the Court Rule to Exclude the Testimony of Profiler