Fact Pattern 10-1
Bridey defends against a suit for breach of contract by Continental Mortgage Company by claiming that their deal-a mortgage loan secured by Bridey's purchase of a house-was unfair because the consideration for their contract was inadequate.
-Refer to Fact Pattern 10-1. The court is most likely to evaluate the adequacy of consid?era?tion if
A) one of the parties claims that they entered into an unwise contract.
B) something exchanged is not of direct economic or financial value.
C) the items exchanged are of unequal value.
D) there is a large disparity in the amount or value of the consideration exchanged.

Question

Fact Pattern 10-1 
Bridey defends against a suit for breach of contract by Continental Mortgage Company by claiming that their deal-a mortgage loan secured by Bridey's purchase of a house-was unfair because the consideration for their contract was inadequate.
-Refer to Fact Pattern 10-1. The court is most likely to evaluate the adequacy of consid?era?tion if
A) one of the parties claims that they entered into an unwise contract.
B) something exchanged is not of direct economic or financial value.
C) the items exchanged are of unequal value.
D) there is a large disparity in the amount or value of the consideration exchanged.

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court is most likely to evaluate the adequacy of consideration if there is a large disparity in the amount or value of the consideration exchanged, as this could indicate unfairness or unconscionability in the contract.