Distributed practice is more effective than is massed practice for learning language-related material but not for learning content devoid of meaning (e.g. ,nonsense syllables).

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Distributed practice, which involves spreading out study sessions over time, is generally more effective than massed practice (cramming) for a wide range of learning materials, including both meaningful content and content devoid of meaning, like nonsense syllables. This is because the spacing effect, which underlies distributed practice, facilitates deeper processing and memory consolidation for various types of information.

Distributed Practice Is More Effective Than Is Massed Practice for Learning