What might demonstrations of both physiological and cultural influences on eating have to say with respect to the nature vs. nurture issue, if anything?
A) They suggest that the motive to eat is largely a matter of nature, not nurture.
B) They suggest that the motive to eat reflects an interaction between nature and nurture.
C) They suggest that the motive to eat is largely a matter of nurture, not nature.
D) They do little to inform the nature vs. nurture debate.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Demonstrations of both physiological and cultural influences on eating suggest that the motive to eat reflects an interaction between nature and nurture, rather than being solely determined by one or the other. This supports the idea that human behavior is shaped by a complex interplay of biological and environmental factors, rather than being determined by either nature or nurture alone.

What Might Demonstrations of Both Physiological and Cultural Influences on Eating