Competitive advantages that are not intuitively obvious are an example of
A) causal ambiguity
B) competitive parity
C) inimitable resources
D) path-dependency

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Causal ambiguity refers to situations where it is difficult to determine the cause of a firm's competitive advantages, making them difficult to replicate. If a competitive advantage is not intuitively obvious, it may be hard for competitors to understand what is causing the advantage and attempts to imitate it may fail. Therefore, the best choice in this case is A. Competitive parity refers to situations where a firm has similar resources and capabilities to its competitors, leading to similar levels of performance, and does not apply here. Inimitable resources are those that are difficult to replicate, but this term is not specific to advantages that are not intuitively obvious, so it is not the best choice. Path-dependency refers to situations where a firm's history and past decisions affect its current path and options, which is not relevant to the question.

Competitive Advantages That Are Not Intuitively Obvious Are an Example