Questioning whether conclusions are warranted by the existing evidence best illustrates
A) critical thinking.
B) functionalism.
C) a biopsychosocial approach.
D) introspection.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Questioning whether conclusions are warranted by the existing evidence requires critical thinking, which involves evaluating evidence, considering alternative explanations, and avoiding biases and assumptions. Functionalism is a school of psychology that emphasizes the adaptive functions of behavior and mental processes, but it does not necessarily involve questioning conclusions or evaluating evidence. The biopsychosocial approach is a model that considers biological, psychological, and social factors in understanding behavior and health, but it does not specifically focus on evaluating evidence. Introspection is the process of examining one's own thoughts and feelings, but it is not directly related to questioning conclusions based on evidence.

Questioning Whether Conclusions Are Warranted by the Existing Evidence Best