In Larry S.Lawrence v.Bainbridge Apartments,the case in the text in which the window washer argued that he was entitled to recover against the building owner for his injuries in a fall,which of the following was the result?
A)The window washer was entitled to a recovery in tort based on the inherently dangerous activity at issue and the defendant's failure to take sufficient precautions.
B)The window washer was not entitled to recover because he took insufficient precautions for his own safety.
C)The window washer was entitled to no recovery based on his status as an independent contractor.
D)The window washer was entitled to workers' compensation as an employee.
E)The window washer was entitled to recovery for breach of contract.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)The court held that an injured independent contractor,although uninsured,
cannot recover under the inherently dangerous activity exception to the doctrine that landowners are not vicariously liable for injuries caused by the negligence of an independent contractor or his employees.
B)The court held that an injured independent contractor,although uninsured,cannot recover under the inherently dangerous activity exception to the doctrine that landowners are not vicariously liable for injuries caused by the negligence of an independent contractor or his employees.