Which of the following is true regarding whether the agreement between Lara and Kim for the sale of dresses satisfied the writing requirement of the UCC?
A) The agreement is likely binding because under the UCC,if two merchants have an oral agreement,a written memo from either party to the other is deemed to satisfy the statute of frauds,even if it is not acknowledged by the receiving party.If it is not objected to within 10 days of receipt,the oral agreement,memorialized by the memo,is binding.
B) The agreement is not binding because Lara did not send Kim a registered letter memorializing the oral conversation as is required by the UCC.
C) The agreement is binding because the UCC has no requirement of a writing under any circumstances.
D) The agreement is likely binding because under the UCC,if two merchants have an oral agreement,there is no requirement of a writing so long as another witness is willing to confirm that within 10 days of the agreement,one of the parties memorialized the agreement by a memorandum to the file,even if it was not sent to the other party.
E) The agreement is not binding because Kim never signed anything by which she agreed to the terms of the oral agreement.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q36: Under Article 2A.of the UCC,what is the
Q37: Under the UCC,items are _ if they
Q38: Which of the following is a special
Q39: Which of the following is true regarding
Q40: The UCC is divided into sections known
Q42: Regarding the "Case Opener," which of the
Q43: Which of the following is true in
Q44: Under the UCC,lease contracts requiring payments of
Q45: Under the UCC,courts allow parties to explain
Q46: What legal concept aims to protect sales
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents