Which of the following is true about contracts that have been subsequently modified?
A)Parol evidence regarding a contract's subsequent modification is inadmissible.
B)Oral evidence of a subsequent written agreement is inadmissible.
C)If the contract's terms require that modification be in writing,oral modifications are admissible.
D)If the agreement is required to be in writing because it is within the statute of frauds,oral modifications are unenforceable.
E)Parol evidence contradictory to the final terms is admissible.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)Although parol evidence contradictory to the final terms is inadmissible,
evidence regarding a contract's subsequent modification is admissible.If the agreement is required to be in writing because it is within the statute of frauds,oral modifications are unenforceable.However,oral evidence of a subsequent written agreement is admissible.In addition,if the contract's terms require that modification be in writing,oral modifications are inadmissible and unenforceable.
B)Although parol evidence contradictory to the final terms is inadmissible,evidence regarding a contract's subsequent modification is admissible.If the agreement is required to be in writing because it is within the statute of frauds,oral modifications are unenforceable.However,oral evidence of a subsequent written agreement is admissible.In addition,if the contract's terms require that modification be in writing,oral modifications are inadmissible and unenforceable.

Which of the Following Is True About Contracts That Have