Flo claims that pink was proper under Section 29,and any court would interpret the contract in Flo's favor.Would Section 29 likely be enforced?
A)Yes,Serena should have read the contract more carefully and,if there were any ambiguity,she should have clarified it prior to signing.
B)Yes,Section 29 should be interpreted according to its plain language.
C)Yes,Section 29 is ambiguous and should be interpreted against Serena.
D)No,Section 29 is ambiguous and should be interpreted against Flo.
E)Yes,Serena signed the contract.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)If the contract contains ambiguity,the judge should interpret it against the
interests of the drafter.After all,the drafter is the one who could have prevented the ambiguity in the first place.
B)If the contract contains ambiguity,the judge should interpret it against the interests of the drafter.After all,the drafter is the one who could have prevented the ambiguity in the first place.
C)If the contract contains ambiguity,the judge should interpret it against the interests of the drafter.After all,the drafter is the one who could have prevented the ambiguity in the first place.
D)If the contract contains ambiguity,the judge should interpret it against the interests of the drafter.After all,the drafter is the one who could have prevented the ambiguity in the first place.
E)If the contract contains ambiguity,the judge should interpret it against the interests of the drafter.After all,the drafter is the one who could have prevented the ambiguity in the first place.

Flo Claims That Pink Was Proper Under Section 29,and Any