In reference to the case in the text,Ex Parte Emmette L.Barran,III,what was the result after the plaintiff sued the national and local Kappa Alpha organization following hazing activities?
A)The court dismissed the lawsuit on the basis that the plaintiff assumed the risk of harm.
B)The court ruled that under pure contributive negligence principles,the plaintiff was entitled to recover.
C)The court ruled that under pure comparative negligence principles,the plaintiff was entitled to recover.
D)The court dismissed the case on the basis of negligence per se.
E)The court ruled that under modified comparative negligence principles,the plaintiff was entitled to recover.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A)The appellate court stated that "the trial court correctly determined that reasonable people could reach no conclusion other than that Jones voluntarily exposed himself to the hazing."
B)The appellate court stated that "the trial court correctly determined that reasonable people could reach no conclusion other than that Jones voluntarily exposed himself to the hazing."
C)The appellate court stated that "the trial court correctly determined that reasonable people could reach no conclusion other than that Jones voluntarily exposed himself to the hazing."
D)The appellate court stated that "the trial court correctly determined that reasonable people could reach no conclusion other than that Jones voluntarily exposed himself to the hazing."
E)The appellate court stated that "the trial court correctly determined that reasonable people could reach no conclusion other than that Jones voluntarily exposed himself to the hazing."

In Reference to the Case in the Text,Ex Parte Emmette