Suppose you are part of an economic analysis team charged with recommending a policy response to pesticide risks. Your team decides to use risk-benefit analysis as its risk management strategy.
a. On the risk side of the analysis, your team reviews the following data from the risk assessment process. Interpret each of these quantitative findings about pesticide risk, by stating precisely what the numerical value(s) mean or imply in each case. Be specific.
(i) Pesticide W: Reference Dose (RfD) = 0.005
(ii) Pesticide X: threshold level of 0 for infants and children
(iii) Pesticide Y: carcinogenic risk of 0.0075 percent
(iv) Pesticide Z: a dose (D)-response (R) function modeled as R = 0 for all D < 0.6, R = - 0.3 + 0.5D for all D 0.6.
b. On the benefit side of the analysis, briefly describe two distinct benefits to society that are relevant to a risk-benefit analysis of pesticides.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q36: Economists support the use of allocative efficiency
Q37: A dose-response function
A) identifies the threshold level
Q38: In risk characterization, a reference dose (RfD)
Q39: In defining environmental risk, exposure refers to
Q40: In the United States, all environmental laws
Q42: According to the textbook application, radon
A) is
Q43: Benefit-cost analysis identifies the
A) allocatively efficient level
Q44: According to benefit-cost analysis
A) identification of the
Q45: Comparative risk analysis is
A) a risk assessment
Q46: According to the text application, the IPCC
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents