Consider the environmental problem created by two paint companies that release chromium wastes into a nearby stream. The state authorities set a standard for the waterway that requires a combined abatement level (A) for chromium of 15 units. Suppose that the two firms, firm 1 and firm 2, face the following marginal abatement cost equations: MAC1 = 3.2A1 and MAC2 = 0.8A2, where costs are measured in thousands of dollars.
a. If the state uses a uniform standard, show that such a ruling would not be cost-effective. Which firm should be abating more, and which firm should be abating less?
b. Now find the cost-effective solution.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q16: A standard that identifies a pollution limit
Q17: Ambient standards identify the desired level of
Q18: The marginal cost of enforcement (MCE) must
Q19: According to the cost-effectiveness criterion, all polluting
Q20: Much of the air pollution in Catano,
Q22: Suppose that two firms, X and Y,
Q23: A technology-based standard
A) specifies a pollution limit
Q24: Suppose that two firms, X and Y,
Q25: Hypothetically, suppose a recent study of hazardous
Q26: An ambient standard
A) specifies a pollution limit
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents