Write a Complete Analysis plus Evaluation for each of the following passages
-The stock market lost 10% of its value last week. Why is that? It appears that the cause was the closure of the Suez Canal, since that was the only factor that was different from the previous week where stock prices were at record highs. No major oil exporting nations lowered exports, no major refiners were experiencing slowdowns, and no major crises were taking place elsewhere in the world.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is This passage contains an argument. The issue is whether the cause of the stock market losing 10% of its value last week was the closure of the Suez Canal. The conclusion is that the cause of the stock market losing 10% of its value last week was the closure of the Suez Canal. The first premise is that the stock market lost 10% of its value last week. The second premise is that the closing of the Suez Canal was the only factor that was different from the previous week where stock prices were at record highs.
This passage contains a subargument. The intermediate conclusion is that the closing of the Suez Canal was the only factor that was different from the previous week where stock prices were at record highs. The first premise is that no major oil exporting nations lowered exports during the week that the stock market fell by 10%. The second premise is that no major refiners were experiencing slowdowns during the week that the stock market fell by 10%. The third premise is that no major crises were taking place elsewhere in the world during the week that the stock market fell by 10%.
This argument is an inductive causal argument. The argument is strong, because it gives evidence that the closing of the Suez Canal was the only possible cause of the stock market losing 10% of its value.
1. The stock market lost 10% of its value last week. Why is that? 2. It appears that the cause was the closure of the Suez Canal, since 3.that was the only factor that was different from the previous week where stock prices were at record highs. 4. No major oil exporting nations lowered exports, 5. no major refiners were experiencing slowdowns, and 6. no major crises were taking place elsewhere in the world.

This passage contains an argument. The issue is whether the cause of the stock market losing 10% of its value last week was the closure of the Suez Canal. The conclusion is that the cause of the stock market losing 10% of its value last week was the closure of the Suez Canal. The first premise is that the stock market lost 10% of its value last week. The second premise is that the closing of the Suez Canal was the only factor that was different from the previous week where stock prices were at record highs. This passage contains a subargument. The intermediate conclusion is that the closing of the Suez Canal was the only factor that was different from the previous week where stock prices were at record highs. The first premise is that no major oil exporting nations lowered exports during the week that the stock market fell by 10%. The second premise is that no major refiners were experiencing slowdowns during the week that the stock market fell by 10%. The third premise is that no major crises were taking place elsewhere in the world during the week that the stock market fell by 10%. This argument is an inductive causal argument. The argument is strong, because it gives evidence that the closing of the Suez Canal was the only possible cause of the stock market losing 10% of its value. 1. The stock market lost 10% of its value last week. Why is that? 2. It appears that the cause was the closure of the Suez Canal, since 3.that was the only factor that was different from the previous week where stock prices were at record highs. 4. No major oil exporting nations lowered exports, 5. no major refiners were experiencing slowdowns, and 6. no major crises were taking place elsewhere in the world.

Write a Complete Analysis Plus Evaluation for Each of the Following