According to the authors, one of the bottom lines of scientific thinking is
A)if a claim is extraordinary, we should trust what the authorities say.
B)if a claim runs counter to what we already know, we can accept it if it appears in a peer-reviewed journal.
C)if a claim runs counter to what we already know, it should be supported by extraordinary evidence.
D)if a claim contradicts what we already know, we should disregard it even if it appears in a scientific journal.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The authors state that one of the bottom lines of scientific thinking is that if a claim runs counter to what we already know, it should be supported by extraordinary evidence. This means that just because something appears in a peer-reviewed journal or is promoted by authorities, we should not blindly trust it if it goes against established scientific knowledge. Instead, we should look for solid evidence that supports the claim.

According to the Authors, One of the Bottom Lines of Scientific