Cassius Ltd and Brutus Ltd agreed to merge by forming another company,Casca Ltd,which acquired all the issued capital of the two companies in a share exchange.Cassius Ltd was a much larger company than Brutus Ltd,with several large equity stakeholders,so that the board of Cassius Ltd emerged from the business combination with the power to dominate the operating and financial policies of the merged entity.Based on these facts:
A) Casca Ltd must be the acquiring entity because it acquired the issued capital of Cassius Ltd and Brutus Ltd.
B) Cassius Ltd is the acquiring entity because its management emerges as the dominant power in the merged entity.
C) neither Cassius Ltd nor Brutus Ltd can be the acquiring entity because their equity securities have been acquired by Casca Ltd.
D) none of the above.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q16: Equity investments falling within the scope of
Q17: List the potential benefits of group formation.
Q18: Accounting Standard AASB 127 applies only to
Q19: If a parent entity is a reporting
Q20: If a company has control over the
Q22: Assume that Scipio Ltd has a controlling
Q23: If a parent loses control of a
Q24: Ownership of more than 50% of the
Q25: Investments in associates (other than those classified
Q26: In the separate financial statements of a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents