Fama and French (1992) found that
A) firm size had better explanatory power than beta in describing portfolio returns.
B) beta had better explanatory power than firm size in describing portfolio returns.
C) beta had better explanatory power than book-to-market ratios in describing portfolio returns.
D) macroeconomic factors had better explanatory power than beta in describing portfolio returns.
E) none of the above is true.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q14: In the results of the earliest estimations
Q19: In the 1972 empirical study by Black,Jensen,and
Q20: The research by Fama and French suggesting
Q22: Early tests of the CAPM involved
A)establishing sample
Q24: Which of the following statements is false
Q25: Tests of multifactor models indicate
A)the single-factor model
Q26: Consider the regression equation: ri - rf
Q27: Consider the regression equation:ri- rf= g0+ g1bi+
Q28: According to Roll,the only testable hypothesis associated
Q31: Fama and French (2002) studied the equity
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents