A difference between the Naylor-Shine and Taylor-Russell expectancy tables is that the
A) Taylor-Russell tables use concurrent validity coefficients; Naylor-Shine tables do not.
B) Naylor-Shine tables use predictive validity coefficients; Taylor-Russell tables use concurrent validity coefficients.
C) Naylor-Shine tables do not require that the criterion be dichotomized; the Taylor-Russell tables do.
D) Taylor-Russell tables are more useful than the Naylor-Shine tables for judging the utility of tests.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Naylor-Shine tables do not require that the criterion be dichotomized, unlike the Taylor-Russell tables, which do require dichotomization of the criterion for their application. This is a key difference in how these tables are used in evaluating the effectiveness of selection tests.

A Difference Between the Naylor-Shine and Taylor-Russell Expectancy Tables Is