Which of the following is a reason not to initially confront the fraudster prior to beginning an investigation?
A) It is illegal to confront a fraudster without a court order.
B) You never know who the fraudster is without an investigation.
C) Catching them in the act through observation can lead to quicker convictions or plea bargains.
D) All of the above.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Catching the fraudster in the act through observation can provide strong evidence and may persuade the fraudster to accept a plea bargain or make a confession, leading to a quicker resolution of the case. Confronting the fraudster without proof can tip them off and make it more difficult to gather evidence. Option A is not entirely accurate; it is not necessarily illegal to confront a fraudster without a court order, although it may not be advisable. Option B is also not entirely accurate as the fraudster can be identified through investigation.

Which of the Following Is a Reason Not to Initially