The problem with the investigator making statements before an investigation is complete stems from the principle of:
A) Reverse Proof.
B) Benford's Law
C) Ratio Analysis of Financial Statements
D) Double Jeopardy

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The principle of Reverse Proof states that the burden of proof lies with the accused, which means that the investigator should not make statements before the investigation is complete as it could unfairly influence public opinion and prejudice the accused. Therefore, making statements before the investigation is complete violates the principle of Reverse Proof. Benford's Law, Ratio Analysis of Financial Statements, and Double Jeopardy are not directly related to this issue.

The Problem with the Investigator Making Statements Before an Investigation